STRAT | Week of November 25, 2024 | Revolutionizing Warfare: The Future of Drones and AI on the Battlefield
The latest installment of STRAT, hosted by retired Marine Intelligence Officer LtCol. Hal Kempfer, dives deep into the complexities of global strategic risk assessment, focusing on significant developments in military operations and geopolitical tensions. The discussion begins with an analysis of Ukraine’s evolving military capabilities, particularly the recent U.S. decision to provide Ukraine with ATACMS missiles, which can strike targets deep within Russian territory. Kempfer elaborates on the implications of this policy shift, noting its potential to alter the battlefield dynamics and the immediate effects observed, such as successful strikes on Russian military assets and the consequential responses from Moscow, including hypersonic missile launches. This strategic maneuvering underscores the delicate balance of power in the region and raises questions about the broader implications for U.S.-Russia relations and the ongoing conflict in Ukraine.
The conversation then transitions to the intriguing developments in Lebanon and Israel, where Kempfer discusses the potential for a ceasefire amidst the ongoing conflict with Hezbollah. He emphasizes the strategic shift in the balance of power, with Israel reportedly achieving significant military successes against Hezbollah forces. With Lebanon facing its own internal pressures and an opportunity to reassert its sovereignty, Kempfer posits that a new relationship between Israel and Lebanon could emerge, one that may foster greater stability in the region. The intricacies of international diplomacy, historical grievances, and the role of external powers create a complex backdrop for these discussions, making the future of this relationship particularly compelling.
Additionally, Kempfer delves into the technological advancements in warfare, specifically the increasing reliance on drone technology in the Ukrainian conflict. He notes that drones now account for a staggering 80% of the casualties inflicted on Russian forces, marking a transformative shift in military tactics. The episode highlights the broader ramifications of drone warfare not only for Ukraine but for global military strategy, suggesting that the lessons learned in this conflict could shape future engagements in counterterrorism, law enforcement, and even criminal operations. This multifaceted exploration of strategic risk assessment offers listeners a profound understanding of the current geopolitical landscape and the factors influencing international security dynamics.
Takeaways:
- The Biden administration's decision to allow longer-range weapons to Ukraine marks a significant strategic shift in U.S. policy towards the ongoing conflict with Russia.
- Drones have become the primary means of inflicting casualties in Ukraine, accounting for 80% of Ukrainian military operations against Russian forces.
- The recent use of advanced missile technology by both Ukraine and Russia highlights the evolving nature of modern warfare and its implications for global security.
- The U.S. has reversed its stance on landmines to counteract Russian tactics, reflecting the changing dynamics of international military engagement.
- Iran's activation of advanced centrifuges raises concerns about its nuclear capabilities and the potential for regional instability in the Middle East.
- The severing of fiber optic cables in the Baltic Sea has raised suspicions of sabotage, possibly involving Chinese and Russian cooperation against NATO countries.
#strategicriskassessment #UkraineConflict #HalKempfer #militaryintelligence #BidenAdministration #ATACMSmissiles #dronewarfare #NorthKorea #RussiaMilitaryTactics #MiddleEastTensions #IranNuclearProgram #Hezbollah #militarytechnology #antipersonnellandmines #globalsecurity #fiberopticsabotage #geopoliticalanalysis #SouthChinaSea #hybridwarfare #internationalrelations #MutualBroadcastingSystem #STRATPodcast
Transcript
From the Mutual Broadcasting System, this is STRAT Strategic Risk Assessment Talk.
Hal Kaemfer:Now, retired Marine intelligence officer and globally recognized risk expert Hal Kaemfer.
Hal Kaemfer:All right, welcome back to strat.
Hal Kaemfer:That we've got a lot of, I think that famous saying that was attributed to George Bush that he'd actually say, but I think Wal Ferrell said it was strategery.
Hal Kaemfer:And we're going to talk about some law strategic assessment going around the world and I'm going to focus on a few things in particular.
Hal Kaemfer:But I'm going to start out by talking about Ukraine's strategic challenge, if you will.
Hal Kaemfer:And there were some big things that happened, some big changes.
Hal Kaemfer:Obviously one of the biggest changes we were waiting for for a long time was that the U.S.
Hal Kaemfer:finally, the Biden White House finally made the decision to allow those longer range weapons that we have, the atacms, the ATACMS missiles, those army, you know, those advanced tactical missiles that the army has that they use that can go out 95, almost 200 miles, allowed the Ukrainians to use that on Russian territory.
Hal Kaemfer:That's about 300 kilometers.
Hal Kaemfer:Ironically, when they made that, made that change of policy, they also said, and we're limiting it to 300km, which I could have had to smile.
Hal Kaemfer:Well, that is the max range of the weapon.
Hal Kaemfer:So yeah, that makes sense.
Hal Kaemfer:The other thing it did that we found out about a day or two later was it also was a green light to the British and the French with their Scalp and Storm Shadow cruise missiles that they could use those as well.
Hal Kaemfer:And since those missiles incorporate US Technology, proprietary US Technology, they were deferring to the United States to change its policy before they were being used.
Hal Kaemfer:And they were used immediately to great effect.
Hal Kaemfer:The Ukrainians used a taco missiles to hit an army depot which reportedly caused devastating damage to that depot, causing some significant losses of what Russians would consider critically needed ammunition for their battles up north, particularly in Kursk.
Hal Kaemfer:And then the Storm Shadow missiles were used on what was kind of, it sounded like on a command post and a big command post.
Hal Kaemfer:And right after that there was a report that the senior, a senior or the senior North Korean general that was assigned with those North Korean forces have been injured, seriously injured.
Hal Kaemfer:And frankly, a lot of times when they say they may have been injured or seriously injured, that's kind of code talk where they may be dead, but they don't want to admit that they were killed in the attack.
Hal Kaemfer:We'll find out just how badly this general was hurt.
Hal Kaemfer:But if they hit the senior North Korean general, you can be assured that there were probably a lot of senior Russian officers, potentially Russian generals that were in close proximity to wherever he was.
Hal Kaemfer:So both of these things had immediate effect.
Hal Kaemfer:And you did see an immediate effect with Russia.
Hal Kaemfer:Okay, Russia turned right around and they launched the thing.
Hal Kaemfer:This, they, you know, initially the result reports came out that this was an ICBM intercontinental ballistic missile.
Hal Kaemfer:Well, that is certainly not needed.
Hal Kaemfer:Still a significant ballistic missile that they had modified.
Hal Kaemfer:So they, they have a faster burning rocket, if you will, that gives them more speed.
Hal Kaemfer:Hence they keep calling it hypersonic, which I always find with ballistic missiles of this type.
Hal Kaemfer:Isn't that kind of a wasted phrase?
Hal Kaemfer:Because they all travel speeds that one could call hypersonic.
Hal Kaemfer:But anyway, but it was called hypersonic and they use that to attack Deep Rope in Ukraine.
Hal Kaemfer:And they also, this missile looks like it was a modified ICBM that had multiple independent reentry vehicle or MERV capability, which is why if you see the video on tv, you'll see what looks like multiple warheads coming down, hitting all at the same time.
Hal Kaemfer:Well, that is MRVs, they have multiple reentry vehicles or multiple little warheads, if you will, that shoot off.
Hal Kaemfer:And this was conventional.
Hal Kaemfer:There was no nuclear stuff.
Hal Kaemfer:But obviously the inference was backing up what they've been saying, which is, you know, that basically this decision by the Biden White House was reckless.
Hal Kaemfer:And, and, and they also putting out a bunch of information ops or psyops to make it sound like a mentally enfeebled Biden made this crazy decision which could lead to World War 3 and all this stuff.
Hal Kaemfer:This is typical Russian psychological operations, trying to reach out to the body politic, if you will.
Hal Kaemfer:The western nations like the US and Europe, but they put all this stuff out there to make it look like it was something bigger than it actually was.
Hal Kaemfer:That is much more weapon than what they need to use tactically or operationally in Ukraine, a lot more than whatever's required to whatever they want to do.
Hal Kaemfer:But they used it.
Hal Kaemfer:All right, and they call this missile on reshnik.
Hal Kaemfer:But it's not really clear if this is really a new missile or just a rewickering of an old missile.
Hal Kaemfer:In fact, it looks like a rewickering of old missile, something called a RS26 Rubiz missile, which was earlier thought to be an ICBM that may have been re wickered into this missile.
Hal Kaemfer:By the way, areshnik in Russian means hazel tree.
Hal Kaemfer:I find that kind of interesting.
Hal Kaemfer:I'm probably inferring the hazelnut.
Hal Kaemfer:But anyway, they did that.
Hal Kaemfer:They did this big attack.
Hal Kaemfer:The attack was back on November 20th.
Hal Kaemfer:And it was also accompanied by some other missile attacks they used using bombers and MiG31, which is one of their most advanced fighter bomber capable, a standalone or a singular attack used, were shot down.
Hal Kaemfer:Now Russia will say that there's no way that this new missile, this IRBM can be shot down.
Hal Kaemfer:That's not really clear.
Hal Kaemfer:What is clear is they aimed at a city where they probably didn't have some of our more advanced air defense systems like Nasums or Patriot missile battery.
Hal Kaemfer:So it got in there, but they're creating that.
Hal Kaemfer:Another thing that happened this recently is the Biden White House did something that was, I want to say for some surprising.
Hal Kaemfer: In: Hal Kaemfer:And part of this came in.
Hal Kaemfer:The wave of the Cold War is over.
Hal Kaemfer:Big wars like that are a thing of the past.
Hal Kaemfer:We're not going to have to worry about it.
Hal Kaemfer:And one of the things that came out of the Cold War and still a legacy of World War I and even going back to World War II was the gazillion, a plethora, if you will, of landmines that were left over in these wars where they were not really accurately recorded as to where they were or if that recorded was done, it was lost to the ages.
Hal Kaemfer:So nobody knew.
Hal Kaemfer:And so you found places like Southeast Asia and elsewhere around the world where there are the minefields that were not really well recorded.
Hal Kaemfer:And of course the problem is that people go out there, they do things.
Hal Kaemfer:Farmers go out in these fields and occasionally step on a landmine that was laid, you know, 10, 20, 30 more years ago and blow themselves up or worse, a child will go out there and come across these things.
Hal Kaemfer:In some cases they may think that some of them, they would think they were a toy or sign this treaty.
Hal Kaemfer:The Russia did not sign this treaty, but the US this week said, hey look, we're going to release, we're going to send anti personnel.
Hal Kaemfer:One of the reasons is, well, two reasons.
Hal Kaemfer:Number one, Russia is using anti personnel landmines, extended loans.
Hal Kaemfer:The other reason is that Russia knows Ukraine doesn't employ these mines.
Hal Kaemfer:So instead of leading these big attacks with armor they have been using, these are often called meat wave attacks where they literally just throw the infantry into fire and they get cut down.
Hal Kaemfer: suffering horrendous losses,: Hal Kaemfer:Just a stunning amount of troops that are being wiped out in these just mindless kamikaze style attacks, if you will, that the Russians have been employing, well, if they have anti personnel mines out there, the thought is that once they start running into these anti personnel mines and they realize that they're get basically disrupted, they will change up their tactics, it'll slow them down and it'll slow down their offensive across the board.
Hal Kaemfer:So that was a decision that was made and we'll see what effect it has on the battlefield.
Hal Kaemfer:But it is interesting, we'll also see what effect it has on the international scene because frankly, there is a lot of pushback.
Hal Kaemfer: nations is very much for that: Hal Kaemfer:Other countries are signatories to that treaty.
Hal Kaemfer:But it is an issue of modern warfare, which is, it's a capability, it's been a capability that's been around for a long time.
Hal Kaemfer:This is not some pseudoscience thing.
Hal Kaemfer:And when you talk about conflict and warfare, you can make these, you know, these, you know, these strong moral arguments about this type of weapon is wrong and certainly has a lot of things are written in these ideas of, you know, we should fight nicer wars, if you will, we should not use certain weapons in certain ways or not use certain weapons at all.
Hal Kaemfer:Syria uses chemical weapons.
Hal Kaemfer:Well, that's banned on multiple levels, but they've been using chemical weapons on their own people for some time.
Hal Kaemfer:Saddam Hussein, Iraq, used chemical weapons on his own people for some time.
Hal Kaemfer:And so some of these weapons are banned that they're not supposed to use, they use anyway.
Hal Kaemfer:And it does get to that issue of, okay, so we have a treaty that no one's complying with.
Hal Kaemfer:What should we do?
Hal Kaemfer:And that's a big issue.
Hal Kaemfer:Now another thing that came up this recently is an interesting number.
Hal Kaemfer:80% of the casualties that Ukrainian is able to inflict on the Russians, 80% of those are now being accomplished by drones.
Hal Kaemfer:If there was any academic debate about the effect of drones on the battlefield, I would hope that's been put to bed by now.
Hal Kaemfer:It's not to say that the war in Ukraine is a drone war per se, unquote, but it is a war that is dominated by drones at a tactical, through the operational, some would even say more strategic level.
Hal Kaemfer:Short range drones, first person view, FPV drones down at the small unit squad level.
Hal Kaemfer:That's, you know, what's, what's around that bunker, what is in that trench line, what's over that hill, what's in that tree line.
Hal Kaemfer:And doing some of the things we see with drone racing, where they zip in there so fast that, and going in through buildings and just revolutionizing Urban warfare, in terms of how that's been fought, these are significant changes that we're seeing.
Hal Kaemfer:And so 80% of those, and also Ukraine, they've been doing a lot of work with semi autonomous, not completely autonomous, but semi.
Hal Kaemfer:See a target, they can mark it and take that out.
Hal Kaemfer:Yep.
Hal Kaemfer:Hit that trench line, whatever it is.
Hal Kaemfer:That the drone will then figure out a way to best prosecute taking out that target.
Hal Kaemfer:Exactly when they're going to put these drones out in mass production.
Hal Kaemfer:And that this could cause a.
Hal Kaemfer:What I would say is this, if that happens in Ukraine, and I have every reason to believe it will, it is going to revolutionize not just the Ukrainian battlefield.
Hal Kaemfer:All right, it's going to be used to great effect on the Ukrainian battlefield, but it is going to revolutionize warfare worldwide.
Hal Kaemfer:It is going to revolutionize counterinsurgency and counterterrorism worldwide.
Hal Kaemfer:It is going to revolutionize terrorism, what terrorists do worldwide.
Hal Kaemfer:It is going to revolutionize what criminals do, smuggling things like narcotics and weapons and doing all kinds of things that they currently do worldwide.
Hal Kaemfer:And it's going to revolutionize law enforcement and security operations, whether public security, private security worldwide in a much more profound way.
Hal Kaemfer:So I'm not saying that they're going to copy exactly what the Ukrainians are doing, but I am saying the Ukrainians are doing something at the strategic and operational level, incorporating this technology in a way that we have not seen before.
Hal Kaemfer:And it is going to have some huge effects, some second and third order effects which go well beyond the headlines of what they're, what they're doing and what they're planning.
Hal Kaemfer:And it's not that this, this technology does exist.
Hal Kaemfer:It is out there, it is being used.
Hal Kaemfer:Drone technology, artificial intelligence dominates the news cycle.
Hal Kaemfer:Constant discussions on this.
Hal Kaemfer:But it is changing the way that we deal with drones.
Hal Kaemfer:We employ drones, and it's part of this whole AI revolution in terms of what's taking place maybe on the cusp of a big change in the background on South Korea, is that they want to become a major player in the international arms market.
Hal Kaemfer:One of the things that's been burgeoning up over the last decade, some would say one to two decades, but certainly over the last decade, is this capability to build some high end weapon systems, a capability to build a lot of ammunition.
Hal Kaemfer:Part of that was the requirements just on the peninsula themselves, dealing with the North Korean, the omnipresent North Korean threat, this huge potential invasion that may happen.
Hal Kaemfer:And I have done military operations in North Korea going back a very, very long time.
Hal Kaemfer:And I will Tell you that it's always been a very tense peninsula in terms of military confrontation and also in terms of COVID activity that goes on.
Hal Kaemfer:Not just the North Koreans, but the Chinese intelligence is in there extensively.
Hal Kaemfer:Russian intelligence is in there extensively.
Hal Kaemfer:It is a busy, busy place, let's just put it that way.
Hal Kaemfer:One of the things that's come out with this big push and there's about 10 to 11,000 North Korean troops that are in Russia, they're going there.
Hal Kaemfer:There are reports it's been getting a lot of play in South Korea.
Hal Kaemfer:A North Korean soldier and his entire unit was pretty much wiped out trying to fight the Ukrainians.
Hal Kaemfer:And I'm assuming they were used probably in one of these meat wave type of attacks, which, you know, one could argue that was a gross misapplication of military manpower, military capability.
Hal Kaemfer:Whatever the reason, they did not do well.
Hal Kaemfer:But there's now reports, and Secretary of Defense Austin has basically said that they're going to be used much more extensively across the board.
Hal Kaemfer:So he's expecting to see that.
Hal Kaemfer:And also that air defense, some very advanced weaponry capabilities, dealing with missiles and other things back to North Korea to include air defense capabilities as well.
Hal Kaemfer:More advanced air defense capabilities.
Hal Kaemfer:Anyway, what this does mean is that South Korea is looking at what it should do now officially.
Hal Kaemfer:If you look on Wikipedia, you have in its.
Hal Kaemfer:It'll say a little over 3 million.
Hal Kaemfer:Okay.
Hal Kaemfer:The reality is it may be closer to five and a half or more million rounds.
Hal Kaemfer:Some of the rounds are older.
Hal Kaemfer:Korea, Reese, for example, NATO countries.
Hal Kaemfer:And then those NATO countries can either use that ammunition to recharge their war reserves and then send the ammunition in their war reserves directly to Ukraine, or they can do something where eventually that ammunition makes it over to Ukraine directly.
Hal Kaemfer:However they do that, it looks like there's a lot of ammunition over there.
Hal Kaemfer:And it's not.
Hal Kaemfer:It's not unrealistic.
Hal Kaemfer:Some would say it's already been going on that hundreds of thousands of rounds of South Korean ammunition has made its way into either backstopping ammunition shipments going into Ukraine or going to Ukraine indirectly.
Hal Kaemfer:But now there's a lot more pressure to do this because of what Russia is doing with North Korea.
Hal Kaemfer:And whereas the president of South Korea, President Yoon, doesn't appear to be in a hurry to make a decision like this.
Hal Kaemfer:It could happen.
Hal Kaemfer:And of course, the other thing is we're looking at this major ground war.
Hal Kaemfer:They've got things like tanks, artillery, and other things that they would love to see showcased in actual combat operations.
Hal Kaemfer:So there is a dollar and cents Reason to sell.
Hal Kaemfer:Another thing I want to point out is hybrid warfare.
Hal Kaemfer:This is called gray zone activities.
Hal Kaemfer:In many cases, we see things such as ships at sea that do not broadcast on their AIs, their automated identification system, which was not meant to track ships as to where they are, so much as to be a safety thing to tell other ships in the area, hey, here I am.
Hal Kaemfer:Don't run into me.
Hal Kaemfer:All right?
Hal Kaemfer:That was the purpose of AIs.
Hal Kaemfer:AIs has since kind of grown into the system that's supposed to identify ships.
Hal Kaemfer:But there is no legal obligation for ships to broadcast their position on AIs.
Hal Kaemfer:In fact, in Gulf of Aden, Baba Van Dam Strait, there was recognized that the Houthis were literally tracking the AIs signals of commercial ships and using those to target those commercial ships.
Hal Kaemfer:Well, real simple, commercial ships and other ships in the area just quit broadcasting AIs.
Hal Kaemfer:That was a safety issue for them, which is it was unsafe to broadcast their AIs systems in that area, which made a lot of sense.
Hal Kaemfer:So they, so they did.
Hal Kaemfer:They stopped doing that.
Hal Kaemfer:And that's an issue with the Russians with their tankers.
Hal Kaemfer:They've been employing this dark tanker fleet, if you will, which a lot of them are really unsafe, old, poorly maintained tankers.
Hal Kaemfer:It truly an environmental disaster, you know, rolling across the seas, if you will, that now doesn't even tell other ships in the area where they are.
Hal Kaemfer:That's been happening a lot.
Hal Kaemfer:So that's.
Hal Kaemfer:This whole gray zone activity has been happening.
Hal Kaemfer:But this last week, we saw reports coming out that a couple of major fiber optic cables were severed in the Baltic.
Hal Kaemfer:This follows on fiber optic cables that have been severed elsewhere to include the Baltic area in the past.
Hal Kaemfer:And this includes underwater pipelines that have had also been damaged under mysterious circumstances to include in the Baltic.
Hal Kaemfer:All right, so this is a, this is a big issue now.
Hal Kaemfer:What's come out of this is the suspicion has been falling on about two or three Chinese ships that were in that area and were right around where those cables were severed.
Hal Kaemfer:And Germany has come out and said that they see this as clearly as being sabotage.
Hal Kaemfer:They didn't say it was Russia was behind the whole thing, but the inference is that Russia was kind of behind the whole thing.
Hal Kaemfer:And the, and the other inference is that the Chinese and the Russians may be working together to sever these cables.
Hal Kaemfer:Now, I don't think it's a, it's a surprised that these cables are connecting the new NATO countries of Scandinavia with the old NATO countries down in mainland Europe or mainland main part of Europe, in this case, between Sweden and Germany that these cables were cut.
Hal Kaemfer:In fact, one of the cables was a truly critical piece of the digital nations network that connects those countries, that connects Europe, if you will, with those with Scandinavia.
Hal Kaemfer:So it has huge implications.
Hal Kaemfer:One of the ships, one of the Chinese, a bulk carrier Chinese ships, the Yiping 3, it was being tracked by the Danish Navy, it went up to the Danish Straits and it is basically being tracked very closely by Denmark to find out what exactly is going on.
Hal Kaemfer:Just to remind everyone, 99% of global digital communications goes via fiber optic cables under the oceans.
Hal Kaemfer:It's not via satellite, it's not via some other way.
Hal Kaemfer:So when you're talking about fiber optic cables, this is a big deal.
Hal Kaemfer:The other thing too is China is not new to the concept of cutting off fiber optic cables.
Hal Kaemfer:This is something they've been doing routinely in the South China Sea.
Hal Kaemfer:It got to be like a regular thing with some of the outer islands that Taiwan owns that Chinese ships would go out there and cut the cables, the fiber optic cables go to those islands.
Hal Kaemfer:One of the islands actually went so far as to build this rather extensive satellite, digital satellite communications array simply because their fiber optic cables kept getting cut so often that they wanted to maintain some level of communications in anticipation that the Chinese would cut their cables again.
Hal Kaemfer:And so the Chinese are not new to the concept of doing this, the Russians are.
Hal Kaemfer:And by the way, sometimes these cables get cut to things that been similar incidents.
Hal Kaemfer: There was In October of: Hal Kaemfer:Ten months later there was a Hong Kong based and by the way Hong Kong part of China, whatever illusion that Hong Kong is and part of the People's Republic of China is long ago changed.
Hal Kaemfer:Hong Kong Richard tanker had damaged, damaged in European storm may have been tied to that as well.
Hal Kaemfer:So this is not the first time we've seen this.
Hal Kaemfer:By the way, it was pointed out that the Chinese story that, that their anchor, that was an anchor, it was an accident and stuff.
Hal Kaemfer:The storm doesn't really bear fruit because when they went back and looked, there were absolutely no storms in the area on the day that they said it would have happened.
Hal Kaemfer:So it was obvious that the Chinese were making up a story on that previous incident and that's why they're really focusing on the Chinese on this.
Hal Kaemfer:Let me talk about, let me switch down south to the Middle east, all right.
Hal Kaemfer:And let's talk about Israel, Iran, the axis of resistance.
Hal Kaemfer:What's going on there?
Hal Kaemfer:You may have seen that Iran announced, in fact they announced it this last, late this last week on Friday, that it was activating its new advanced centrifuges.
Hal Kaemfer:Well, now, what are centrifuges?
Hal Kaemfer:Well, centrifuges, obviously, for those who are aware, like, yes, they move very quickly.
Hal Kaemfer:They.
Hal Kaemfer:And what it is, is part of the process whereby uranium is enriched, as in a nuclear program, in this case Iran's nuclear program.
Hal Kaemfer:And they have been targeted before.
Hal Kaemfer:In fact, the very famous cyber attack which occurred against Iran, which caused the centrifuges to literally destroy themselves.
Hal Kaemfer:So it's been a big issue.
Hal Kaemfer:Now, this comes right on the heels of a United nations report by its nuclear watchdog agency, which criticized Iran for not cooperating with the UN in that regard.
Hal Kaemfer:And Iran has said that they're going to.
Hal Kaemfer:There's a lot of some advanced centrifuges, different types that they're going to be using.
Hal Kaemfer:And well, one of the things with this conflict, and particularly with what happened with the last Israeli strike, which was a fairly significant widespread strike against Iran in response to a fairly big strike by Iran against Israel, was that it may trigger Iran.
Hal Kaemfer:Iran may sit back and say, hmm, and this was the hope that they would sit back and say, hmm, maybe we shouldn't do anything to provoke the Israelis anymore.
Hal Kaemfer:Maybe we're more vulnerable to Israeli attack than we want to let on.
Hal Kaemfer:And here's the thing.
Hal Kaemfer:Israel is not going to invade Iran.
Hal Kaemfer:Israel has no designs on taking Iranian territory.
Hal Kaemfer:First off, it's geographically something that just ain't going to happen.
Hal Kaemfer:They're not even close to each other, geographically speaking.
Hal Kaemfer:There's, there's countries between them, a lot of terrain, and I'm kind of familiar with a lot of terrain between them and between Israel and Iran.
Hal Kaemfer:So that wasn't going to happen anytime soon.
Hal Kaemfer:And I would say not going to happen, period.
Hal Kaemfer:So that wasn't something there.
Hal Kaemfer:But Iran needs to maintain for their, for the regime.
Hal Kaemfer:They need to maintain the idea that they are opposed to Israel, that they want to see the destruction of Israel.
Hal Kaemfer:And there is this, you know, this pervasive myth story, if you will, that has been out there for many years, that Israel is the last European colony.
Hal Kaemfer:And that's because so many of the Israeli citizens either, well, not so much they themselves, but certainly their parents or grandparents, many of them came over from Europe after the Holocaust and moved into Israel.
Hal Kaemfer:So there is a lot of this Ashkenazi Jews that are Israeli citizens, a lot of European, European, I'd say European Jews, I guess the way to put it, that have moved back to Israel.
Hal Kaemfer:And so this Whole pervasive thing throughout the Middle east that all this is nothing more than a European colonial thing.
Hal Kaemfer:And that's why Israel's there.
Hal Kaemfer:And hence, hence you have a number of countries that were dedicated to basically destroying Israel.
Hal Kaemfer:And now that's changed a lot.
Hal Kaemfer:Obviously some of these extremist groups like Hezbollah based in Lebanon and in Hamas in the Gaza Strip, to a lesser extent the west bank still, that is their mantra.
Hal Kaemfer:They want to destroy Israel and Iran would like to destroy Israel.
Hal Kaemfer:All right, so Iran has been assessed many times being very close to having the capability of possibly making a nuclear weapon.
Hal Kaemfer:And so this is getting a lot of focus and a lot of attention.
Hal Kaemfer:The US and other countries have said, no, we can't have this extremist, very dangerous regime in Iran with nuclear weapons.
Hal Kaemfer:And what this, the implications are that if they do develop a nuclear weapon, if they test a nuclear weapon or do something like that, this will put a strong imperative on the US and other countries, not just Israel, to deal with this threat.
Hal Kaemfer:And that brings us back to B2 bombers.
Hal Kaemfer:B2 bombers were used against the Houthi rebels not too long ago in October, actually launched from the United States.
Hal Kaemfer:They're not something we normally base overseas, maybe in Guam, all right, but not anywhere close to bombers came out of the US really long legs, as you can imagine.
Hal Kaemfer:These flight legs are extremely long.
Hal Kaemfer:And one of the things that B2S can do is not just drop nuclear weapons, but they drop some conventional weapons, very unique, very big, which are truly bunker, the ultimate bunker busters, if you will.
Hal Kaemfer:These are weapons that bore into wave effect that will, that will destroy underground facilities, nuclear program.
Hal Kaemfer:Israel does not have B2 bombers.
Hal Kaemfer:We're the only country, the U.S.
Hal Kaemfer:the only country has B2 bombers.
Hal Kaemfer:And we have recently used those bombers in the Middle east against a proxy that was targeting not just ships, but actually targeting US Military craft or targeting our US Navy ships.
Hal Kaemfer:We have used those bombers in that area.
Hal Kaemfer:So the statement is made that, hey, don't ignore the fact that we have this capability, which the Israelis don't, that could be turned to the stealth bomber capability to go after your hard to hit nuclear sites.
Hal Kaemfer:And of course, Israel has done some things to make it very clear that those nuclear facilities are vulnerable to air attack.
Hal Kaemfer:And so I just kind of want to bring that up.
Hal Kaemfer:That's something we're going to watch very closely to see what's going on because it's possible that that that can happen.
Hal Kaemfer:The other thing I think that's interesting too is that things are coming into place very quickly for a possible ceasefire in Lebanon, not in Gaza, but in Lebanon.
Hal Kaemfer: N Security Council Resolution: Hal Kaemfer:The UN peacekeepers there weren't doing anything.
Hal Kaemfer:And one of the things that will come out after this war is done, it's already starting to come out, is just how pervasive the Hezbollah terrorist paramilitary presence was in that area that was supposed to be demilitarized from Hezbollah paramilitary presence.
Hal Kaemfer:And they're finding caches of weapons.
Hal Kaemfer:They found a huge cachet of Russian weapons, Russian supplied weapons.
Hal Kaemfer:Whether those came through Syria or from Iran to Hezbollah or directly from Russia, that's still to be figured out.
Hal Kaemfer:But they found this massive cache of weapons that they were using that they put there in a school, a schoolyard, which is under international law, a protected site that's been targeted.
Hal Kaemfer:They found these weapons going in there.
Hal Kaemfer:And obviously it goes back to what was the Lebanese army doing?
Hal Kaemfer:What were these international peacekeepers doing that Hezbollah was basically running amok in this area where they weren't supposed to be.
Hal Kaemfer:So with that said, the Israelis have gone through, largely forced out, the Hezbollah presence in that region.
Hal Kaemfer:They have really debilitated.
Hal Kaemfer:In fact, this last week or two weeks, they said that basically the military structure, basically the Israelis have been saying that Hezbollah has been militarily defeated, if you will.
Hal Kaemfer:Now, that doesn't mean they've stopped fighting.
Hal Kaemfer:It doesn't mean they don't have a lot of capabilities.
Hal Kaemfer:They still fire missiles.
Hal Kaemfer:But it does mean that it's been dramatically degraded across the board, degraded to the point where certainly those in Lebanese armed forces are probably looking at this, saying this might be a bit of a strategic inflection point for us.
Hal Kaemfer:They no longer outnumber us, they no longer outgun us.
Hal Kaemfer:There might be a way for the government of Lebanon, they kind of regain control over this areas that were previously completely controlled by Hezbollah.
Hal Kaemfer:So I'm not saying that this, if you will, the ceasefire is going to happen right away, but I am saying there's been a lot of progress between what Hezbollah and Lebanon have agreed to with the US proposal and what Israel requires in order to maintain security and that they won't be targeted from that area of southern Lebanon.
Hal Kaemfer:So there's a lot going on.
Hal Kaemfer:This thing is kind of rolling out across the board.
Hal Kaemfer:One of the things that is interesting is that Israel really isn't thrilled with having France as part of the peacekeeping force.
Hal Kaemfer:And there's some feeling that the French have been A lot of different levels.
Hal Kaemfer:There's been some antagonism between the French and Israel, but also the feeling is that France has been too permissive in the past of letting Hezbollah do things.
Hal Kaemfer:And Lebanon is saying absolutely no, Brits, that Britain can't be part of it, as they feel that Britain is too close of an ally to Israel.
Hal Kaemfer:So I find that rather interesting.
Hal Kaemfer:So there's some issues there that still have to be kind of worked out in that regard.
Hal Kaemfer:Now, what can we take from all of this?
Hal Kaemfer:What we can kind of take is that there might be a pathway, way for Lebanon to kind of research its territorial integrity and its distinct sovereign status.
Hal Kaemfer:And it might be that we see a different relationship emerging between Lebanon and Israel.
Hal Kaemfer:Not surprisingly, if you look at Lebanon, they go, where is our biggest threat?
Hal Kaemfer:Certainly they look at Syria, but Syria has been so debilitated by the civil war that they're not the threat that they were, say, 10 or 20 years ago.
Hal Kaemfer:Israel is where it is.
Hal Kaemfer:And obviously they see Israel as a significant threat.
Hal Kaemfer:And they say, would they invade?
Hal Kaemfer:Well, Israel has abated yet again.
Hal Kaemfer:So, yes, they are a threat to them.
Hal Kaemfer:But with that, with whatever comes out of this agreement, there might be a very different relationship that emerges.
Hal Kaemfer:And I would point to there is an area of exclusive economic zones that was highly disputed between Lebanon and Israel, and it's an area of gas and oil production that has gas and oil production potential in that area.
Hal Kaemfer:And Lebanon and Israel, after many years of, let's just say, some tough words back and forth and a lot of antagonism on this issue, eventually worked out an agreement on how this is going to work out.
Hal Kaemfer:And I think that they're based on the success at sea, they might have success on the ground that really could change the strategic relationship.
Hal Kaemfer:What Israel would probably want to see in Lebanon is a very strong Lebanese government that could contain these extremist factions within its territory, like Hezbollah and certainly any remaining Hamas or Palestinian Islamic Jihad factions that pose a terrorist threat or a current military threat or military threat to Israel.
Hal Kaemfer:That's what they would like to see.
Hal Kaemfer:They would like to see probably the Lebanese government as it is envisioned, as it is basically stated in its constitution, where it is a sort of a.
Hal Kaemfer:It's a balance between ethnicities, between religions.
Hal Kaemfer:As a multiethnic, you know, a country with multiple religions that doesn't pose this extremist ideology that wants to destroy Israel.
Hal Kaemfer:That's what they would like to see.
Hal Kaemfer:And certainly the potential to put that in place is there.
Hal Kaemfer:Thank you for listening to another podcast of Strat.
Hal Kaemfer:We have had what is truly a strategic risk assessment talk.
Hal Kaemfer:We've covered a big chunk of the world.
Hal Kaemfer:We've talked about the Middle East.
Hal Kaemfer:We've talked about Europe.
Hal Kaemfer:We've talked about global implications to go into the South China Sea.
Hal Kaemfer:That's pretty much a good chunk of the world right there.
Hal Kaemfer:We've talked about the US and literally US Military assets that could potentially be engaged in the Middle east being launched in the United States.
Hal Kaemfer:So I, I will tell you that this was a big talk, a lot hopefully, to think about and look forward to our next Strat that will be coming out next week.
Hal Kaemfer:But thanks again.
Hal Kaemfer:By the way, if you want to catch me more frequently, not every day, but I'm on very regularly on Fox Live now, their digital streaming service, and regularly on News Nation and catch me on those two networks and then a variety of local television stations, primarily on the west coast or the Southwest.
Hal Kaemfer:So thanks again and thanks for listening to Strat.